South Dakota Voices Response: Will, thank you for sharing this information. It is extremely helpful.
Chat comment from WB: "One year ago last September, after several days of chemtrails over the Black Hills, I drove home from Rapid City to my place south of Pringle. I waited in Hill City for a hail storm to pass. Between Pringle and my turn off near Argyle there was so much hail the snow plows were out. I pulled over and put hail in a water bottle. I took the hail when I got home and put it in a mason jar. I had the mason jar water tested in Rapid City. They detected aluminum, barium and chromium. What more is that the water had a "Total Dissolved Solids" measurement of 10 ppm. That is the same as double osmosis filtered water. This means the US Government is spraying "aerosolized" chemicals and polluting everything with these chemicals. I have the report from the company that did the testing, contact me for a copy. I did not vote to be poisoned. Global warming is a scam. All weather modification should be stopped immediately."
Chemtrails are as big a joke as global warming. When you just give it a little thought you will realize just how ridiculous the idea is. Next time you see a car start on a cold day and see the condensation coming out of the tail pipe, that is the same as your 'chem trail', except the engine is massively larger so make a larger condensation trail.
Allow me to explain how much bigger an aircraft engine than a car engine. A 5liter car engine is pretty big by todays standards. In cubic inch size it is a 302 cubic inch engine. The B-17 of WWII had a mid size, for the day, engine with 1820 cubic inches, six times larger than a large car engine to day. Ever seen video footage of B-17's during WWII and se e the massive amount of condensation trails they put out? And that was just a mid-size large aircraft engine. That tiny amount of common sense should end the conspiracy, but common sense is not that common when someone wants to believe in the worst. So here is some more debunking.
Every pound on an aircraft, has to recorded on a thing called a weight and balance book, every piece and its location has to be documented. Cargo is recorded separately,
In order to have a spray system you are going to need a holding tank. This tank will need mounts, grounding points, filler and vent valves, a dump valve, tubing, a pump with a motor, circuit breakers, control switches, and routing, there is a lot to it. Another problem is as you go up pressure lowers so the also has to be a pressure control system to keep the 'chemicals' from boiling and all that means weight and has to be documented, or aircraft crash. Again this is separate from cargo.
This also means that these parts have to listed in a parts break down manual somewhere so they can be fixed when they break, and mechanical things do break. Then there is the problem with crashes. Are aircraft equipped with this phantom system not allowed to crash and expose the 'chem system'?
Now lets look at the 100's of millions of witnesses that are all in agreement to keep this phantom system secret. There are corporate executives in every country that builds aircraft. Aircraft designers, assembly line workers, airport service technicians in every country of the world that would have to know what that system does. All depot level mechanics in every country with an aircraft overhaul depot has to know what they are working on. Let me say that again, in every country in the world! There are no mystery tanks or plumbing, or wiring, or controls on any aircraft ever. Then there are flight crew. Pilots have to know what every switch in that flight deck does. In an emergency there can be no mystery switches. Then there are pilots that washout of programs or get grounded for life. So add all the thousands of pilots and flight engineers into conspiracy with all of them keeping the secret, yeah right.
Now for history and here is where the numbers get really big and shows just how impossible this 'chem trail' lie is. It is not just the millions in the aircraft industry around the globe right now, plus those that moved to other jobs and retires, but all the hundreds of millions that have been in the business since 'chem trails' were first seen at McCook Army Airfield in 1924. Yes, condensation trails have been recorded since 1924 when they were experimenting with the first superchargers. What about all the condensation trails seen during WWII? Are they chems also? The whole chem trail thing is completely impossible. There is no way to keep that many millions quite about something that actually exists.
This was easier than proving the moon landing happened, yes there are flat brainers out there that still think it was faked.
Don’t worry, “Tom” writing below will claim you faked the results. It is so tiresome arguing with people who can’t see that we are clearly being poisoned by our own government
What is even more tiresome are people that no nothing about aircraft or aircraft operations somehow know that aircraft are spraying something other then hot dry air hitting cold moist air and making a little cloud. Equally tiresome are doom and gloom closed minded people that will ignore facts just because they do not want to believe them.
When I was a child, weather modification was big news, as related in this post. Weather modification was considered an important military weapon, and the American public was subjected to those tests just like we used to not drink milk when the radiation fell from the skies due to nuclear testing. Attempts to modify the weather were made without notifying or "scaring" the public, and not all tests on modification of the weather, storms in particular, went well. You can research it.
Now weather modification rarely makes headlines, which may mean that it's taking place so often that it's considered standard procedure. This is yet another area of science where we need transparency and public education concerning exactly who and what, if anything, our government, or even private NGOs or corporations are doing in regards to modifying the weather.
The consequences of such actions are difficult to fully identify or quantify. The natural environment of our region, nation and planet is the result of an incredibly complex system of systems interlocked with many other biological and geological systems, not exclusively earthbound. Life and weather on the surface of the earth are affected by magma and magnetic cycles deep inside the earth as well as the moon's gravity and cycles of the sun's radiation. I rather doubt that anyone has a firm grasp of the potential consequences that could come from meddling in any of Nature's innumerable interconnecting elements.
When I was a child, a long time ago, we were bombarded with global warming propaganda. By the time I'd hit my late twenties, it changed to fear of an impending ice age. Decades after that it changed back to global warming, but the people who were actually paying attention to these flip-flopping ideas, and started pointing out these scientific contradictions, made the fear monger's change the two conflicting terms into global climate change. The new term, global climate change, served many purposes. It keeps the experts from looking ridiculous due to their flip-flopping, and that meant the younger generation wouldn't also see how little the experts are really experts of.
While I firmly believe that humans create entirely too much pollution, waste, and depletion of natural resources, but I also believe that we underestimate the power of our planet, our solar system, our galaxy, and our universe. I think the biggest problem with science is that the scientists usually think their right despite the fact that, most of the time, they are usually proved to be wrong. Maybe not entirely wrong, but being incorrect is still being wrong, however minute that incorrect calculation is.
I don't have any confidence in experts, and I don't think we should allow them to tinker with nature. In 1971-1972 there was a drought in South Dakota, and the experts thought it was a good idea to cloud seed. They said it would end the drought, and claimed it would produce a precipitation miracle, saving the farmers from another year of dry weather. Instead of a miracle, it produced a nightmare, and a lot of people died. I lived that nightmare, and attended many funerals in the wake of the largest flood Rapid City South Dakota had ever seen. I can remember looking out across Rapid City, and wondering what happened to Bacon Park. Where it should have been had been replaced by a vast body of water. When the water level finally subsided, it looked like something out of an apocalyptic movie, only it wasn't a movie, but it was apocalyptic, and it was the result of experts who said that they knew what they were doing.
The bottom line is that there's infinitely more that the experts don't know than the tiny amount that they do know. I don't think nature is something to be triffled with. Our planet has been doing a pretty good job taking care of itself over the last 4 billion years. It's allowed us to call it home for a small speck of that time, and we should respect it, not toy with it.
This is for the people that say weather modification is just a conspiracy. Here is all the patents for your conspiracy now do the research and look them up!!
Weather Modification Patents
YEAR - PATENT NUMBER - PATENT NAME
1891 – US462795A – method of producing rain-fall
1914 – US1103490A – rain maker (balloon images)
1917 – US1225521A – protection from poisonous gas in warfare
1920 – US1338343A – process and apparatus for the production of intense artificial clouds, fogs, or mists
1924 – US1512783A – composition for dispelling fogs
1927 – US1619183A – process of producing smoke clouds from moving aircraft
1928 – US1665267A – process of producing artificial fogs
1932 – US1892132A – atomizing attachment for airplane engine exhausts
1933 – US1928963A – electrical system and method (for spraying chemtrails)
1934 – US1957075A – airplane spray equipment
1936 – US2045865A – skywriting apparatus
1936 – US2052626A – method of dispelling fog (mit)
1937 – US2068987A – process of dissipating fog
1939 – US2160900A – method for vapor clearing
1941 – US2232728A – method and composition for dispelling vapors
If you still think geoengineering is a myth, it’s time to look at the official records, patents, and military strategies that describe these techniques in detail.
You won’t find this on Google. But if you search “geoengineering” on DuckDuckGo, here’s what you’ll find:
• DARPA reports detailing military use of weather modification and atmospheric aerosol spraying.
• DoD research papers on ionospheric manipulation and electromagnetic weather control.
• Army War College strategy documents discussing how weather warfare can be used as a force multiplier in global conflicts.
• Declassified government documents confirming decades of weather modification experiments, including HAARP, stratospheric aerosol injections, and cloud seeding.
• US patents for “stratospheric aerosol injection,” “atmospheric spraying devices,” and “solar radiation management” techniques.
The truth is out there—you just have to be willing to see it.
We definitely have weather modification in the Aberdeen area. I see chem-trails (no, they are not con-trails) frequently. Maybe it is all okay, but then why is it not more out in the open so that there can be a discussion?
Once upon a time, if you wanted to know about insane conspiracy theories, you had to wait all year until Thanksgiving to hear them from your crazy and slightly drunk uncle. Now, thanks to the innovation of the internet, South Dakota Voices can deliver them directly to your favorite device roughly once a day. Amazing how far we have come.
Thank you for the comment. We would like to know more about what you think is wrong with the post so we can learn from you. What are the flaws in the logic?
I'm going to choose not to debate the conspiracy theory (or "conspiracy fact" as you call it) of weather manipulation simply because I doubt either of us will change our minds.
But if we take your argument at face value, the federal government is manipulating weather for some nefarious reason, and we can stop it by... Passing state level laws? I'm not sure I follow the logic there.
Thanks for the note. Is it possible the government thought is was a necessary thing and it got out of control? That seems to be a common problem over the last 50-75 years whether it was nuclear bombs, the use of a lot of pharmaceutical drugs, etc. Perhaps people did not understand the complexity of the systems (human bodies, nuclear damage, weather implications, ...) they were working with? Not sure, but some thinking about consequences rather than just charging ahead might have made sense. About state involvement. Sometimes it is easier to unwind things that have gone haywire in small increments (states). Especially in this case where some people are talking about climate whiplash and the centralized approach seems to have failed. https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/2023-3-fall/stress-test/solar-geoengineering-could-wreak-havoc-planet
I’ll give the author credit for dismissing the debunked conspiracy theories that School of Mines started the Rapid City Flood. But then that might as well have been an oversight on her part like not knowing the well established fact that meteorologists and climatologists of the 70s were not all claiming that the ice age was coming.
Bill, thank you for joining the conversation. Could you please provide some links from the 50 and 60, so we can learn about the differences of opinion during that period.
Yes smart boy, and it seems like the "conspiracy theorists" seem to be batting 1000. While dipshit boomer mainstream losers like you keep getting thrown out at first base.
Vince, I don't think conspiracy theorists are batting 1000 as you say. I think being skeptical and government and power structures is a good thing, but too many people spitball out a million random ideas and rely on random blogs instead of experts. And when at some point, through sheer numbers, these theorists stumble onto some half truth they crow as if all their ideas have been vindicated when nothing could be further from the truth.
Climate doom and gloom is nothing more than a money laundering racket. They get away with it because fools have short memories.
Weather is not out of control, this is ridiculous. First there is no way to judge a 4 million year eco system on a few hundreds years of data, flat stupid. Second I have been hearing climate change lie since the late 1960's, and we are still here.
1968 global cooling because of pollution will screen out the sun. That will make a need for more polluting power stations that will make the problem worse by making more energy to heat our homes. All would be lost in 10 years. The answer was 10's of millions for soot scrubbers inside large coal fired factories of all kinds. Size depended on how many tones of coal was used per day.
Early 1970's it changed to global warming. Same set up just change block out sun to keeping heat in. Everything would be lost in 10 years if mid sized coal burning plants did not get scrubbers.
Mid 1970's back to cooling. Now it was the fault of small coal fired plants and cars. more millions more scrubbers more millions for catalytic converters on cars.
Late 1970's back to warming and it will be to late in 10 years, more millions spent. But wait shouldn't we be dying of cold right now?
Early 1980's we went back to cooling for about a year. More millions clean up. But wait it has been 10 years we should be dying heat.
March 1980 Mt. St. Helens explodes and puts some 540 million tons of ash and pollutants into the air in a matter of hours. Lots more than humans create in five years. What nobody reported was the earth had filtered all of it out in seven years, yet we are all still here. The earth is pretty good at taking care of pollution.
Mid 1980's back to warming but now it is finally getting traction because of the fools with short memories and the propaganda press, another 10 year warning. More millions on new ways to make cars run cleaner and change over coal fired plants to natural gas. Wait what happened to the millions spent on scrubbers? What happened to the mid 1970's warnings, we should be dying for a third time now.
late 1980's same thing, more millions.
Early 1990's Al Gore publishes his doom and gloom book full of disaster, not one single prediction he made came true, not one. We should be dead four times by now, all the other predictions are a joke also. But more millions were spent to fight it.
mid 1990's ditto
Late 1990's more millions needed, early 200's more millions, mid 200's more millions . . .
The the idiotic Paris climate change thing that blamed the US for all the worlds pollution and we had to pay more taxes on their pollution than anyone. Even the real polluters like China, India, Russia, and every third world nation there is. But it is all the fault of the USA, not anyone else, just the USA.
Anyone see the patterns?
Make a scary disaster, predict the world will end in ten years so everyone forgets about it, make millions. Global warming is nothing more than a money laundering raket.
The vacillation in viewpoints is a bit crazy and it is fun to watch what happens when the government changes what it funds (people need money to keep their research labs functioning, so their viewpoints seem to shift quickly). It does seem a bit concerning that the U.S. is spending 17% of GDP on healthcare and that 80% of the water sources in South Dakota are polluted. There could be (likely are) many reasons for these issues. Talking about different possibilities seems to make sense.
One of the concerns people have about spraying is the health implications and water contamination. It is covered in a lot more detail in the video that is linked in the article.
I'm sorry I don't understand your comment. This post is not about global warming. It is about weather modification. Weather modification can be used to warm, cool, create droughts, make it rain, change the path and or strength of storms, etc. There are a wide variety of weather modification techniques (there are links in the post). The post did spend some time talking about one form of manipulation. It did also talk about the history of weather manipulation (government committees, etc.). One of the readers provided a list of the patents. Another reader shared some data he collected on hail.
You're making some of the points that I highlighted earlier. The, so called, experts have flip-flopped so many times, over the past 50+ years, that they decided to use the term 'Global Climate Change', instead 'Global Cooling', and 'Global Warming'. The people who were paying attention started calling them out when they swapped the two terms every 10-20 years, sparking fears of an impending ice age, followed by creating the fear of melting ice and rising water levels, then back to the ice age fears. It's fear mongering, and fear generates money. It's amazing how images of people, like Greta Thunberg, traveling in luxury, around the world, are rationalized as selfless commitment. Logic, alone, should show everyone that these people aren't as selfless as they claim to be. I wonder how much of the money given to people, like Thunberg, goes to feeding starving people, or providing clean drinking water in areas were water-borne disease kills millions. I'd wager that if just half of the money that these fear monger's collect went towards curing diseases, like miliaria, it would save millions of lives annually. I'm not sure how people can rationalize saving lives that can't be qualified, over lives that can.
Thank you for bringing up all the posturing. I agree it is interesting to watch the finger pointing. Sometimes finger pointing is to cover something else that is going on beneath the surface. Do you think something else is going on or is it just about making money?
Sorry for the delay, but I'm not feeling well. I'm glad though, because I think Tom makes some valid points. I'm not an anti-vaxer, but I never start standing in line until I can see all of the information. When that information is incomplete, and it often is, I become hesitant. I use that same philosophy with everything. I don't like conspiracy theories, in general, because they almost always lack information. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and extraordinary evidence is the information that most conspiracy theories lack. As far as weather manipulation goes, I witnessed the outcome of cloud seeding in 1972. It produced the deadliest flood in the area I've lived in for most of my life. Dubai is another example, and the list goes on, but, again, the experts will tell you that cloud seeding doesn't cause floods. I might agree with them if there wasn't so many examples. I think it boils down to something else that Tom said. The experts, aka the people in charge of science, underestimate the overwhelming access that people have, which is the Internet. That doesn't mean that people should believe everything on the Internet. You have to consume all of the information first, and then you can make a much better decision about what you think the information is telling you. Finally, it's clear that money is a motivating factor, and that applies to everything, everywhere, but it doesn't have to be what makes you believe in something. Just because a person has the money to spread their truth, doesn't mean that it should become your truth. Often times you have to turn over every single rock, even the small ones, to find all of the information you need to decide what you believe is the truth. The loudest person isn't necessarily the one that's right. I would say, from a lifetime of experience, that the loudest person is usually wrong. Right decisions can be made by doing 3 things. Reading, watching, and comparing. There are no shortcuts.
Money equals control. Tax the US into poverty with the Paris climate agreement then scare the peasants by dividing, that is to say with diversity, and controlling the narrative with censorship, both are about control. Bill Gates Foundation planned on a third part after the first two worked, de-population. De-population is something they have openly advocated for and using the twin demons of climate change and some new in-curable disease control would have been easy, or should have been. Crazy conspiracy stuff? Not hardly, grifter are making lots of money off of flat earth, anthropomorphic climate change, moon landing hoax, Big foot, loch ness, moth man and Russia interfering with US elections are the stuff of crazy people being willfully ignorant in the face of facts. This is different. These two, climate and disease scare have both had trial runs. Problem was the internet was bigger than they could completely control. We know that the FBI spied on the Trump campaign in 2016 and used agents to control speech on social platforms. Let a few people tell the truth then demonize them and the rest will fall in line. This censorship was supposed to keep people in the dark about the real meaning of that jab. Why did we need more and more boosters? Why did they call the next variant of covid strain 19A, B, C and so ? Because they already had covid marketed. Just a few more boosters and they would have had the world in the habit of taking boosters on a regular basis. Add in something else that causes death and in no time the earth is down to 500 million just like they used to post on the Gates foundation web site. The hundreds that have died because of the boosters is no accident, it was research. Too many people started to see through the smoke and mirrors because the internet was too big.
Hello Milo, good to read a clear point. Another angle is the ice core samples that were supposed to be so damming and prove carbon is going up. All those cores have proven was carbon has fluctuated for millions of years. It is not effected by what little us humans do to add to it, none. That is why the ice cores are no longer mentioned.
You are also correct when you say that the money spent was a total waste. If this was serious, then long term development of real energy sources would have been the priority, not just repackaging old stuff.
We're in total agreement. I only wish more people were paying attention, and doing their due diligence to find all of the available information before joining a cause. Just like you, I've watched the experts go from global warming, to ice age fears, and back to global warming. Fear, and crisis's generates attention. Generating attention generates money.
I’ll play. Patricia Reed. They are, in fact, contrails. Literally water vapour. There has been no successful manipulation of weather on a scale large enough to matter. The notion that HALO, chemtrails, etc etc exists is poppycock. Gibberish made up by fraudsters preying on the intellectually vulnerable.
Having been on the end trying to intentionally change the weather, we can’t do it. Mortal man simply doesn’t wield that kind of power.
We only alter it inadvertently through our own greed and selfishness. It’s a passive result. Not an active consequence.
Agnes, thank you for the comment. Do you have data to suggest that there is not high altitude spraying? It sounds like chemical analysis would be important.
I remember well, actual interviews of military personnel; "whistleblowers" if you will, rendering statements of their actual participation in flight operations, designed to lay out "chemtrails" of foreign particulates, designed to obtain a variety of results, which seemed pretty sinister at times. Interestingly, it seemed these whistle-blowers had little to nothing to gain, beyond exposing truths, at the cost of forced retirements, destroyed credibilties/careers, smear campaigns etc, by "shoot-the-messenger" anti-free speech activists who clearly had something to hide from the public.
I'm retired now, & just to old to worry about these things, much less pursue them.
We have chemtrails in Tyndall also, and they have a lot in Pierre. If you go on X many, many people have them. There has been studies where after they spray, the soil tests positive for
aluminum, barium, strontium, lithium, and other metals. People get sick after they spray.
Florida, Pennsylvania and other states have legislation to ban it.
Thank you for the information. Yes, the high altitude arial spraying appears to be a concern in many places now. Do you know if we have done any soil testing in South Dakota?
I don't know that. I have written to my congress people asking for legislation on chemtrails, flouride in our water, and banning lab meat, but I did not receive a response from either one. They are sleeping.
I think posting your concerns on blogs is an excellent way to get the word out. I am wondering if this substack might be another place to post those concerns (https://robincognito.substack.com/) since this writer is focused on the South Dakota DC representatives.
Well now I’m sure this isn’t one of the professional independent news outlets like the SD Searchlight, SD Standard or Dakota Scout picking up the slack from the AL and RCJ. This was a cavalcade of poorly researched tropes and little credible science.
For starters, your claim that global cooling had consensus in the science community is simply false, as established in serious historical studies of scientists of the period rather than episodes of “In Search of” and similar equivalents of what we’d now call click bait.
Likewise this goes on line with the usual misinformed claims in this thread that climate change in public discussion is a lefty conspiracy. Likewise this ignores the one of the first world leaders to openly call for climate and environmental policies: *Margaret Thatcher* —well before Al Gore published his book.
Quite to the contrary to global warming being a myth at worse or trendy (since 1850!) at best, the insurance industry, defence & national security apparatus, and most importantly, the fossil fuel industry have long been aware of its hazards such as the impact to our aging infrastructure, instability in weak states, our warfighters battlespace, and yes, North Sea and Gulf of Mexico oil rigs.
More still, pandering to people talking about HAARP and chemtrails (both of which have been similarly but laughably debunked), demonstrates a lack of seriousness that I’ve sadly come to expect from conspiracy followers and Dunning Kruger Online University alumni.
HAARP. It is interesting to read both sides on that issue. A lot of material has been removed from the Internet recently on the original purpose of HAARP. Having worked in Alaska, word on the streets is much different than what is available online. With all the conflicts on peer review (check out the over $1 billion 2020-2022 by pharma to people who did review -- https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pharma-paid-1-billion-reviewers-top-medical-journals/), my approach is to read as many things as possible and then come to my own conclusion. I intentionally linked to a source that is providing content that is counter to conventional thinking.
Thank you for your concern about the quality of the "reporting". South Dakota Voices (SDV) is not a news service. The goal of the blog is to provide a platform where people can discuss complicated topics that are impacting/could impact South Dakota. Each post is written with a slant/distinct perspective to encourage discussion. This SDV writer has a background in science and has experience in the private sector, academia, and working with government agencies.
I agree there is never one viewpoint, although there always seems to be a lot of pressure to move in one direction or another. I am curious what could have happened if Project Blue Nile was taking actions that would support the cooling argument and pushed things towards warming or if the Soviets and the US were is some sort of competition that accelerated warming.
South Dakota Voices Response: Will, thank you for sharing this information. It is extremely helpful.
Chat comment from WB: "One year ago last September, after several days of chemtrails over the Black Hills, I drove home from Rapid City to my place south of Pringle. I waited in Hill City for a hail storm to pass. Between Pringle and my turn off near Argyle there was so much hail the snow plows were out. I pulled over and put hail in a water bottle. I took the hail when I got home and put it in a mason jar. I had the mason jar water tested in Rapid City. They detected aluminum, barium and chromium. What more is that the water had a "Total Dissolved Solids" measurement of 10 ppm. That is the same as double osmosis filtered water. This means the US Government is spraying "aerosolized" chemicals and polluting everything with these chemicals. I have the report from the company that did the testing, contact me for a copy. I did not vote to be poisoned. Global warming is a scam. All weather modification should be stopped immediately."
Chemtrails are as big a joke as global warming. When you just give it a little thought you will realize just how ridiculous the idea is. Next time you see a car start on a cold day and see the condensation coming out of the tail pipe, that is the same as your 'chem trail', except the engine is massively larger so make a larger condensation trail.
Allow me to explain how much bigger an aircraft engine than a car engine. A 5liter car engine is pretty big by todays standards. In cubic inch size it is a 302 cubic inch engine. The B-17 of WWII had a mid size, for the day, engine with 1820 cubic inches, six times larger than a large car engine to day. Ever seen video footage of B-17's during WWII and se e the massive amount of condensation trails they put out? And that was just a mid-size large aircraft engine. That tiny amount of common sense should end the conspiracy, but common sense is not that common when someone wants to believe in the worst. So here is some more debunking.
Every pound on an aircraft, has to recorded on a thing called a weight and balance book, every piece and its location has to be documented. Cargo is recorded separately,
In order to have a spray system you are going to need a holding tank. This tank will need mounts, grounding points, filler and vent valves, a dump valve, tubing, a pump with a motor, circuit breakers, control switches, and routing, there is a lot to it. Another problem is as you go up pressure lowers so the also has to be a pressure control system to keep the 'chemicals' from boiling and all that means weight and has to be documented, or aircraft crash. Again this is separate from cargo.
This also means that these parts have to listed in a parts break down manual somewhere so they can be fixed when they break, and mechanical things do break. Then there is the problem with crashes. Are aircraft equipped with this phantom system not allowed to crash and expose the 'chem system'?
Now lets look at the 100's of millions of witnesses that are all in agreement to keep this phantom system secret. There are corporate executives in every country that builds aircraft. Aircraft designers, assembly line workers, airport service technicians in every country of the world that would have to know what that system does. All depot level mechanics in every country with an aircraft overhaul depot has to know what they are working on. Let me say that again, in every country in the world! There are no mystery tanks or plumbing, or wiring, or controls on any aircraft ever. Then there are flight crew. Pilots have to know what every switch in that flight deck does. In an emergency there can be no mystery switches. Then there are pilots that washout of programs or get grounded for life. So add all the thousands of pilots and flight engineers into conspiracy with all of them keeping the secret, yeah right.
Now for history and here is where the numbers get really big and shows just how impossible this 'chem trail' lie is. It is not just the millions in the aircraft industry around the globe right now, plus those that moved to other jobs and retires, but all the hundreds of millions that have been in the business since 'chem trails' were first seen at McCook Army Airfield in 1924. Yes, condensation trails have been recorded since 1924 when they were experimenting with the first superchargers. What about all the condensation trails seen during WWII? Are they chems also? The whole chem trail thing is completely impossible. There is no way to keep that many millions quite about something that actually exists.
This was easier than proving the moon landing happened, yes there are flat brainers out there that still think it was faked.
Don’t worry, “Tom” writing below will claim you faked the results. It is so tiresome arguing with people who can’t see that we are clearly being poisoned by our own government
What is even more tiresome are people that no nothing about aircraft or aircraft operations somehow know that aircraft are spraying something other then hot dry air hitting cold moist air and making a little cloud. Equally tiresome are doom and gloom closed minded people that will ignore facts just because they do not want to believe them.
Hey cum breath, I fly aircraft. Do you?
Nope, I fix them. Still sore about loosing the moon landing hoax?
When I was a child, weather modification was big news, as related in this post. Weather modification was considered an important military weapon, and the American public was subjected to those tests just like we used to not drink milk when the radiation fell from the skies due to nuclear testing. Attempts to modify the weather were made without notifying or "scaring" the public, and not all tests on modification of the weather, storms in particular, went well. You can research it.
Now weather modification rarely makes headlines, which may mean that it's taking place so often that it's considered standard procedure. This is yet another area of science where we need transparency and public education concerning exactly who and what, if anything, our government, or even private NGOs or corporations are doing in regards to modifying the weather.
The consequences of such actions are difficult to fully identify or quantify. The natural environment of our region, nation and planet is the result of an incredibly complex system of systems interlocked with many other biological and geological systems, not exclusively earthbound. Life and weather on the surface of the earth are affected by magma and magnetic cycles deep inside the earth as well as the moon's gravity and cycles of the sun's radiation. I rather doubt that anyone has a firm grasp of the potential consequences that could come from meddling in any of Nature's innumerable interconnecting elements.
One introduction to the documentation of these issues: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eh5_DlzPXI0
Thank you for sharing that link!
When I was a child, a long time ago, we were bombarded with global warming propaganda. By the time I'd hit my late twenties, it changed to fear of an impending ice age. Decades after that it changed back to global warming, but the people who were actually paying attention to these flip-flopping ideas, and started pointing out these scientific contradictions, made the fear monger's change the two conflicting terms into global climate change. The new term, global climate change, served many purposes. It keeps the experts from looking ridiculous due to their flip-flopping, and that meant the younger generation wouldn't also see how little the experts are really experts of.
While I firmly believe that humans create entirely too much pollution, waste, and depletion of natural resources, but I also believe that we underestimate the power of our planet, our solar system, our galaxy, and our universe. I think the biggest problem with science is that the scientists usually think their right despite the fact that, most of the time, they are usually proved to be wrong. Maybe not entirely wrong, but being incorrect is still being wrong, however minute that incorrect calculation is.
I don't have any confidence in experts, and I don't think we should allow them to tinker with nature. In 1971-1972 there was a drought in South Dakota, and the experts thought it was a good idea to cloud seed. They said it would end the drought, and claimed it would produce a precipitation miracle, saving the farmers from another year of dry weather. Instead of a miracle, it produced a nightmare, and a lot of people died. I lived that nightmare, and attended many funerals in the wake of the largest flood Rapid City South Dakota had ever seen. I can remember looking out across Rapid City, and wondering what happened to Bacon Park. Where it should have been had been replaced by a vast body of water. When the water level finally subsided, it looked like something out of an apocalyptic movie, only it wasn't a movie, but it was apocalyptic, and it was the result of experts who said that they knew what they were doing.
The bottom line is that there's infinitely more that the experts don't know than the tiny amount that they do know. I don't think nature is something to be triffled with. Our planet has been doing a pretty good job taking care of itself over the last 4 billion years. It's allowed us to call it home for a small speck of that time, and we should respect it, not toy with it.
This is for the people that say weather modification is just a conspiracy. Here is all the patents for your conspiracy now do the research and look them up!!
Weather Modification Patents
YEAR - PATENT NUMBER - PATENT NAME
1891 – US462795A – method of producing rain-fall
1914 – US1103490A – rain maker (balloon images)
1917 – US1225521A – protection from poisonous gas in warfare
1920 – US1338343A – process and apparatus for the production of intense artificial clouds, fogs, or mists
1924 – US1512783A – composition for dispelling fogs
1927 – US1619183A – process of producing smoke clouds from moving aircraft
1928 – US1665267A – process of producing artificial fogs
1932 – US1892132A – atomizing attachment for airplane engine exhausts
1933 – US1928963A – electrical system and method (for spraying chemtrails)
1934 – US1957075A – airplane spray equipment
1936 – US2045865A – skywriting apparatus
1936 – US2052626A – method of dispelling fog (mit)
1937 – US2068987A – process of dissipating fog
1939 – US2160900A – method for vapor clearing
1941 – US2232728A – method and composition for dispelling vapors
1941 – US2257360A – desensitized pentaerythritol tetranitrate explosive
1946 – US2395827A – airplane spray unit (us. dept. of agriculture)
1946 – US2409201A – smoke-producing mixture
1949 – US2476171A – smoke screen generator
1949 – US2480967A – aerial discharge device
1950 – US2527230A – method of crystal formation and precipitation
1951 – US2550324A – process for controlling weather
1951 – US2570867A – method of crystal formation and precipitation (general electric)
1952 – US2582678A – material disseminating apparatus for aeroplanes
1952 – US2591988A – production of tio2 pigments (DuPont)
1952 – US2614083A – metal chloride screening smoke mixture
1953 – US2633455A – smoke generator
1954 – US2688069A – steam generator
1955 – US2721495A – method and apparatus for detecting minute crystal forming particles suspended in a gaseous atmosphere (general electric)
1956 – US2730402A – controllable dispersal device
1957 – US2801322A – decomposition chamber for monopropellant fuel
1958 – US2835530A – process for the condensation of atmospheric humidity and dissolution of fog
1959 – US2881335A – generation of electrical fields (haarp – for re-charging clouds!)
1959 – US2903188A – control of tropical cyclone formation
1959 – US2908442A – method for dispersing natural atmospheric fogs and clouds
1960 – US2962450A – fog dispelling composition (see references)
1960 – US2963975A – cloud seeding carbon dioxide bullet
1961 – US2986360A – aerial insecticide dusting device
1962 – US3044911A – propellant system
1962 – US3056556A – method of artificially influencing the weather
1964 – US3120459A – composite incendiary powder containing metal coated oxidizing salts
1964 – US3126155A – silver iodide cloud seeding generator (main commercial ingredient)
1964 – US3127107A – generation of ice-nucleating crystals
1964 – US3131131A – electrostatic mixing in microbial conversions
1965 – US3174150A – self-focusing antenna system (haarp)
1966 – US3257801A – pyrotechnic composition comprising solid oxidizer, boron and aluminium additive and binder
1966 – US3234357A – electrically heated smoke producing device
1966 – US3274035A – metallic composition for production of hygroscopic smoke
1967 – US3300721A – means for communication through a layer of ionized gases (haarp)
1967 – US3313487A – cloud seeding apparatus
1967 – US3338476A – a heating device for use with aerosol containers
1968 – US3410489A – automatically adjustable airfoil spray system with pump
1969 – US3429507A – rainmaker
1969 – US3430533A – aircraft dispenser pod having self-sealing ejection tubes
1969 – US3432208A – fluidized particle dispenser (us air force)
1969 – US3437502A – titanium dioxide pigment coated withb silica and aluminium (DuPont)
1969 – US3441214A – method and apparatus for seeding clouds
2001 -US20030085296A1 - Hurricane and tornado control device
Courtesy of Inky Bailey.
Via Rachel Giangregorio
This type of detailed information is very helpful. Are you compiling all these things in one place?
If you still think geoengineering is a myth, it’s time to look at the official records, patents, and military strategies that describe these techniques in detail.
You won’t find this on Google. But if you search “geoengineering” on DuckDuckGo, here’s what you’ll find:
• DARPA reports detailing military use of weather modification and atmospheric aerosol spraying.
• DoD research papers on ionospheric manipulation and electromagnetic weather control.
• Army War College strategy documents discussing how weather warfare can be used as a force multiplier in global conflicts.
• Declassified government documents confirming decades of weather modification experiments, including HAARP, stratospheric aerosol injections, and cloud seeding.
• US patents for “stratospheric aerosol injection,” “atmospheric spraying devices,” and “solar radiation management” techniques.
The truth is out there—you just have to be willing to see it.
Happy truthing,
Dr. Edward Group, DC
Join @drgroupofficial
Thank you for sharing this information. It is particularly helpful to share information, since some places are removing or limiting access.
Want to know how aliens feel about chemtrails? https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4ksvp9E0l9U
LOL
We definitely have weather modification in the Aberdeen area. I see chem-trails (no, they are not con-trails) frequently. Maybe it is all okay, but then why is it not more out in the open so that there can be a discussion?
Great question. Open dialog and discussion are very important.
South Dakota Voices Response: Roger, thank you for joining the conversation.
Email comment from RR: "Thank you"
Once upon a time, if you wanted to know about insane conspiracy theories, you had to wait all year until Thanksgiving to hear them from your crazy and slightly drunk uncle. Now, thanks to the innovation of the internet, South Dakota Voices can deliver them directly to your favorite device roughly once a day. Amazing how far we have come.
Thank you for the comment. We would like to know more about what you think is wrong with the post so we can learn from you. What are the flaws in the logic?
I'm going to choose not to debate the conspiracy theory (or "conspiracy fact" as you call it) of weather manipulation simply because I doubt either of us will change our minds.
But if we take your argument at face value, the federal government is manipulating weather for some nefarious reason, and we can stop it by... Passing state level laws? I'm not sure I follow the logic there.
Thanks for the note. Is it possible the government thought is was a necessary thing and it got out of control? That seems to be a common problem over the last 50-75 years whether it was nuclear bombs, the use of a lot of pharmaceutical drugs, etc. Perhaps people did not understand the complexity of the systems (human bodies, nuclear damage, weather implications, ...) they were working with? Not sure, but some thinking about consequences rather than just charging ahead might have made sense. About state involvement. Sometimes it is easier to unwind things that have gone haywire in small increments (states). Especially in this case where some people are talking about climate whiplash and the centralized approach seems to have failed. https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/2023-3-fall/stress-test/solar-geoengineering-could-wreak-havoc-planet
I’ll give the author credit for dismissing the debunked conspiracy theories that School of Mines started the Rapid City Flood. But then that might as well have been an oversight on her part like not knowing the well established fact that meteorologists and climatologists of the 70s were not all claiming that the ice age was coming.
I see that you posted some links below. I'll take a look. Thank you.
Bill, thank you for joining the conversation. Could you please provide some links from the 50 and 60, so we can learn about the differences of opinion during that period.
You don't think we can decide what happens in our own state? That is the definition of a cuck.
Yes smart boy, and it seems like the "conspiracy theorists" seem to be batting 1000. While dipshit boomer mainstream losers like you keep getting thrown out at first base.
Vince, I don't think conspiracy theorists are batting 1000 as you say. I think being skeptical and government and power structures is a good thing, but too many people spitball out a million random ideas and rely on random blogs instead of experts. And when at some point, through sheer numbers, these theorists stumble onto some half truth they crow as if all their ideas have been vindicated when nothing could be further from the truth.
Climate doom and gloom is nothing more than a money laundering racket. They get away with it because fools have short memories.
Weather is not out of control, this is ridiculous. First there is no way to judge a 4 million year eco system on a few hundreds years of data, flat stupid. Second I have been hearing climate change lie since the late 1960's, and we are still here.
1968 global cooling because of pollution will screen out the sun. That will make a need for more polluting power stations that will make the problem worse by making more energy to heat our homes. All would be lost in 10 years. The answer was 10's of millions for soot scrubbers inside large coal fired factories of all kinds. Size depended on how many tones of coal was used per day.
Early 1970's it changed to global warming. Same set up just change block out sun to keeping heat in. Everything would be lost in 10 years if mid sized coal burning plants did not get scrubbers.
Mid 1970's back to cooling. Now it was the fault of small coal fired plants and cars. more millions more scrubbers more millions for catalytic converters on cars.
Late 1970's back to warming and it will be to late in 10 years, more millions spent. But wait shouldn't we be dying of cold right now?
Early 1980's we went back to cooling for about a year. More millions clean up. But wait it has been 10 years we should be dying heat.
March 1980 Mt. St. Helens explodes and puts some 540 million tons of ash and pollutants into the air in a matter of hours. Lots more than humans create in five years. What nobody reported was the earth had filtered all of it out in seven years, yet we are all still here. The earth is pretty good at taking care of pollution.
Mid 1980's back to warming but now it is finally getting traction because of the fools with short memories and the propaganda press, another 10 year warning. More millions on new ways to make cars run cleaner and change over coal fired plants to natural gas. Wait what happened to the millions spent on scrubbers? What happened to the mid 1970's warnings, we should be dying for a third time now.
late 1980's same thing, more millions.
Early 1990's Al Gore publishes his doom and gloom book full of disaster, not one single prediction he made came true, not one. We should be dead four times by now, all the other predictions are a joke also. But more millions were spent to fight it.
mid 1990's ditto
Late 1990's more millions needed, early 200's more millions, mid 200's more millions . . .
The the idiotic Paris climate change thing that blamed the US for all the worlds pollution and we had to pay more taxes on their pollution than anyone. Even the real polluters like China, India, Russia, and every third world nation there is. But it is all the fault of the USA, not anyone else, just the USA.
Anyone see the patterns?
Make a scary disaster, predict the world will end in ten years so everyone forgets about it, make millions. Global warming is nothing more than a money laundering raket.
The vacillation in viewpoints is a bit crazy and it is fun to watch what happens when the government changes what it funds (people need money to keep their research labs functioning, so their viewpoints seem to shift quickly). It does seem a bit concerning that the U.S. is spending 17% of GDP on healthcare and that 80% of the water sources in South Dakota are polluted. There could be (likely are) many reasons for these issues. Talking about different possibilities seems to make sense.
What does health care and the fake statistic about water being undrinkable have to do with the climate lie?
Why do you try to change the subject so often?
One of the concerns people have about spraying is the health implications and water contamination. It is covered in a lot more detail in the video that is linked in the article.
I think you are on the wrong thread. this one is about the global warming lie.
I'm sorry I don't understand your comment. This post is not about global warming. It is about weather modification. Weather modification can be used to warm, cool, create droughts, make it rain, change the path and or strength of storms, etc. There are a wide variety of weather modification techniques (there are links in the post). The post did spend some time talking about one form of manipulation. It did also talk about the history of weather manipulation (government committees, etc.). One of the readers provided a list of the patents. Another reader shared some data he collected on hail.
The part that showed up in my email was.
Ummmmm.... the last time I checked, rainfall does tend to drop into South Dakota's watershed.
You get it.
You're making some of the points that I highlighted earlier. The, so called, experts have flip-flopped so many times, over the past 50+ years, that they decided to use the term 'Global Climate Change', instead 'Global Cooling', and 'Global Warming'. The people who were paying attention started calling them out when they swapped the two terms every 10-20 years, sparking fears of an impending ice age, followed by creating the fear of melting ice and rising water levels, then back to the ice age fears. It's fear mongering, and fear generates money. It's amazing how images of people, like Greta Thunberg, traveling in luxury, around the world, are rationalized as selfless commitment. Logic, alone, should show everyone that these people aren't as selfless as they claim to be. I wonder how much of the money given to people, like Thunberg, goes to feeding starving people, or providing clean drinking water in areas were water-borne disease kills millions. I'd wager that if just half of the money that these fear monger's collect went towards curing diseases, like miliaria, it would save millions of lives annually. I'm not sure how people can rationalize saving lives that can't be qualified, over lives that can.
Thank you for bringing up all the posturing. I agree it is interesting to watch the finger pointing. Sometimes finger pointing is to cover something else that is going on beneath the surface. Do you think something else is going on or is it just about making money?
Sorry for the delay, but I'm not feeling well. I'm glad though, because I think Tom makes some valid points. I'm not an anti-vaxer, but I never start standing in line until I can see all of the information. When that information is incomplete, and it often is, I become hesitant. I use that same philosophy with everything. I don't like conspiracy theories, in general, because they almost always lack information. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and extraordinary evidence is the information that most conspiracy theories lack. As far as weather manipulation goes, I witnessed the outcome of cloud seeding in 1972. It produced the deadliest flood in the area I've lived in for most of my life. Dubai is another example, and the list goes on, but, again, the experts will tell you that cloud seeding doesn't cause floods. I might agree with them if there wasn't so many examples. I think it boils down to something else that Tom said. The experts, aka the people in charge of science, underestimate the overwhelming access that people have, which is the Internet. That doesn't mean that people should believe everything on the Internet. You have to consume all of the information first, and then you can make a much better decision about what you think the information is telling you. Finally, it's clear that money is a motivating factor, and that applies to everything, everywhere, but it doesn't have to be what makes you believe in something. Just because a person has the money to spread their truth, doesn't mean that it should become your truth. Often times you have to turn over every single rock, even the small ones, to find all of the information you need to decide what you believe is the truth. The loudest person isn't necessarily the one that's right. I would say, from a lifetime of experience, that the loudest person is usually wrong. Right decisions can be made by doing 3 things. Reading, watching, and comparing. There are no shortcuts.
Money equals control. Tax the US into poverty with the Paris climate agreement then scare the peasants by dividing, that is to say with diversity, and controlling the narrative with censorship, both are about control. Bill Gates Foundation planned on a third part after the first two worked, de-population. De-population is something they have openly advocated for and using the twin demons of climate change and some new in-curable disease control would have been easy, or should have been. Crazy conspiracy stuff? Not hardly, grifter are making lots of money off of flat earth, anthropomorphic climate change, moon landing hoax, Big foot, loch ness, moth man and Russia interfering with US elections are the stuff of crazy people being willfully ignorant in the face of facts. This is different. These two, climate and disease scare have both had trial runs. Problem was the internet was bigger than they could completely control. We know that the FBI spied on the Trump campaign in 2016 and used agents to control speech on social platforms. Let a few people tell the truth then demonize them and the rest will fall in line. This censorship was supposed to keep people in the dark about the real meaning of that jab. Why did we need more and more boosters? Why did they call the next variant of covid strain 19A, B, C and so ? Because they already had covid marketed. Just a few more boosters and they would have had the world in the habit of taking boosters on a regular basis. Add in something else that causes death and in no time the earth is down to 500 million just like they used to post on the Gates foundation web site. The hundreds that have died because of the boosters is no accident, it was research. Too many people started to see through the smoke and mirrors because the internet was too big.
Hello Milo, good to read a clear point. Another angle is the ice core samples that were supposed to be so damming and prove carbon is going up. All those cores have proven was carbon has fluctuated for millions of years. It is not effected by what little us humans do to add to it, none. That is why the ice cores are no longer mentioned.
You are also correct when you say that the money spent was a total waste. If this was serious, then long term development of real energy sources would have been the priority, not just repackaging old stuff.
We're in total agreement. I only wish more people were paying attention, and doing their due diligence to find all of the available information before joining a cause. Just like you, I've watched the experts go from global warming, to ice age fears, and back to global warming. Fear, and crisis's generates attention. Generating attention generates money.
I’ll play. Patricia Reed. They are, in fact, contrails. Literally water vapour. There has been no successful manipulation of weather on a scale large enough to matter. The notion that HALO, chemtrails, etc etc exists is poppycock. Gibberish made up by fraudsters preying on the intellectually vulnerable.
Having been on the end trying to intentionally change the weather, we can’t do it. Mortal man simply doesn’t wield that kind of power.
We only alter it inadvertently through our own greed and selfishness. It’s a passive result. Not an active consequence.
Agnes, thank you for the comment. Do you have data to suggest that there is not high altitude spraying? It sounds like chemical analysis would be important.
I remember well, actual interviews of military personnel; "whistleblowers" if you will, rendering statements of their actual participation in flight operations, designed to lay out "chemtrails" of foreign particulates, designed to obtain a variety of results, which seemed pretty sinister at times. Interestingly, it seemed these whistle-blowers had little to nothing to gain, beyond exposing truths, at the cost of forced retirements, destroyed credibilties/careers, smear campaigns etc, by "shoot-the-messenger" anti-free speech activists who clearly had something to hide from the public.
I'm retired now, & just to old to worry about these things, much less pursue them.
Thank you Paul for sharing that information.
We have chemtrails in Tyndall also, and they have a lot in Pierre. If you go on X many, many people have them. There has been studies where after they spray, the soil tests positive for
aluminum, barium, strontium, lithium, and other metals. People get sick after they spray.
Florida, Pennsylvania and other states have legislation to ban it.
Thank you for the information. Yes, the high altitude arial spraying appears to be a concern in many places now. Do you know if we have done any soil testing in South Dakota?
I don't know that. I have written to my congress people asking for legislation on chemtrails, flouride in our water, and banning lab meat, but I did not receive a response from either one. They are sleeping.
I think posting your concerns on blogs is an excellent way to get the word out. I am wondering if this substack might be another place to post those concerns (https://robincognito.substack.com/) since this writer is focused on the South Dakota DC representatives.
https://rumble.com/v6pwms0-cloud-seeding-and-weather-modification-are-just-conspiracy-theories.html
Video could be a lie, could be true. No idea:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mazjwNxd5Nqf
Well now I’m sure this isn’t one of the professional independent news outlets like the SD Searchlight, SD Standard or Dakota Scout picking up the slack from the AL and RCJ. This was a cavalcade of poorly researched tropes and little credible science.
For starters, your claim that global cooling had consensus in the science community is simply false, as established in serious historical studies of scientists of the period rather than episodes of “In Search of” and similar equivalents of what we’d now call click bait.
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/89/9/2008bams2370_1.xml
Likewise this goes on line with the usual misinformed claims in this thread that climate change in public discussion is a lefty conspiracy. Likewise this ignores the one of the first world leaders to openly call for climate and environmental policies: *Margaret Thatcher* —well before Al Gore published his book.
https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/107817
Quite to the contrary to global warming being a myth at worse or trendy (since 1850!) at best, the insurance industry, defence & national security apparatus, and most importantly, the fossil fuel industry have long been aware of its hazards such as the impact to our aging infrastructure, instability in weak states, our warfighters battlespace, and yes, North Sea and Gulf of Mexico oil rigs.
https://climateandsecurity.org/2019/02/update-chronology-of-u-s-military-statements-and-actions-on-climate-change-and-security-2017-2019/#:~:text=Since%20January%202017%2C%20twenty%2Done,implications%20for%20the%20United%20States.
https://fragilestatesindex.org/2021/05/20/turning-up-the-heat-climate-change-fragility-and-conflict/
https://graphics.latimes.com/oil-operations/
https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/local/environment/climate-change/article297501718.html
More still, pandering to people talking about HAARP and chemtrails (both of which have been similarly but laughably debunked), demonstrates a lack of seriousness that I’ve sadly come to expect from conspiracy followers and Dunning Kruger Online University alumni.
HAARP. It is interesting to read both sides on that issue. A lot of material has been removed from the Internet recently on the original purpose of HAARP. Having worked in Alaska, word on the streets is much different than what is available online. With all the conflicts on peer review (check out the over $1 billion 2020-2022 by pharma to people who did review -- https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pharma-paid-1-billion-reviewers-top-medical-journals/), my approach is to read as many things as possible and then come to my own conclusion. I intentionally linked to a source that is providing content that is counter to conventional thinking.
Thank you for your concern about the quality of the "reporting". South Dakota Voices (SDV) is not a news service. The goal of the blog is to provide a platform where people can discuss complicated topics that are impacting/could impact South Dakota. Each post is written with a slant/distinct perspective to encourage discussion. This SDV writer has a background in science and has experience in the private sector, academia, and working with government agencies.
I agree there is never one viewpoint, although there always seems to be a lot of pressure to move in one direction or another. I am curious what could have happened if Project Blue Nile was taking actions that would support the cooling argument and pushed things towards warming or if the Soviets and the US were is some sort of competition that accelerated warming.
Ahhhhh yes, we have an "expert." I'm sure you have lots of degrees to show the world what a smart boy you are!
https://www.cremieux.xyz/p/the-end-of-credentialism
Try Telegram and look for people that daily speak on many subjects, information is not silenced on this site.
I am compiling a list of weather modification companies that are chemtrailing us to death. There are many more than what is on this list.
At the bottom is Monkey Werx sit rep from 1/18/2023. He shows some planes that are in the air modifying the weather in Texas.
http://www.weathermodification.com
http://www.nawmc.org/faq/
https://weathermod.org
https://www.fmwfchamber.com/list/member/weather-modification-llc-2527
http://www.southtexasweathermodification.com
https://www.americanelements.com/weather-modification
https://cwcb.colorado.gov/focus-areas/supply/weather-modification-program
https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/weather/weathermod.htm
https://www.3dsa.gr/en/activities-en/weather-modification
https://www.aviationpros.com/airports/consultants/airfield/company/12333282/weather-modification-international
https://www.skywaterventures.com/cloud-seeding-services.html
http://www.weathermodification.com/program-services.php
https://climateviewer.com/2019/10/04/shocking-electric-weather-modification-companies-in-2019/
https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/list-of-companies-engaged-in-weather-modification/
Monkey werx video 👇
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sze9eXzhL0o
Thank you for providing this list. It is very helpful for our discussion.