We are told the world is warming. People are blaming it on cows, cars, …. None of it makes much logical sense. When things defy logic, one has to wonder if there might be something else in play.
We have been modifying weather for a long time. Cloud seeding, creating precipitation, was discovered in 1946 and was tested in nature in 1947. This discovery led to a flurry of activity in the climate modification area.
In fact, Congress formed an Advisory Committee on Weather Control in 1953. This committee submitted its final report in December of 1957 recommending that the National Science Foundation develop a long range program of basic and applied research in weather modification.
On May 28, 1954 the cover of Collier’s magazine showed a man changing the seasons with levers. Then in 1957, Lyndon B. Johnson told a joint session of Congress, “From space one could control the earth's weather, cause drought and floods, change the tides and raise the levels of the sea, make temperate climates frigid,…” And the May 25, 1958 issue of the American Weekly ran an article that talked about a Cold War race to see who would control the earth’s thermometers.
Weather modification continued to advance. There were special high security programs in the U.S. and the Soviet Union. In 1974, Soviet climatologist Mikhail Ivanovich Budyko proposed stratospheric aerosol injection, spraying particles into the stratosphere to reflect light and change the temperature and conditions on the earth surface.
That same year, the New York Times ran an article called, the War of the Weathers. At this point, there was all kinds of posturing about weather modification. The U.S. Government had been working climate modification for some time and there was a climate war waging with the Soviets. Interestingly, at this point, there was concern about global cooling.
Because of the escalation of the climate war, in 1977 the Soviet Union and the United States entered into the Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD) which prohibited the military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques. This was a relatively weak agreement that allowed both countries to continue modifying the weather.
The United States began using HAARP (The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) in the early 1990s. There is all kinds of interesting material on how this technology is used to control weather.
Fast forward to today. Recently we have been hearing all kinds of things about global warming. Yet, in the 1970s there was a trend toward global cooling. Was some type of weather manipulation done between the 1970s and now that warmed the planet so much that we are now desperate to cool it? And instead of admitting what happened we are trying to blame it on everything from cows to cars.
It is interesting to note that there are all kinds of people working on the climate crisis. However, officially, we are hearing nothing is being done other than to ask people and companies to reduce their carbon footprints. Given the situation, that seems unlikely.
In 2023 Robert Kennedy Jr. interviewed Dane Wigington about Chemtrails. Dane talks about collecting data on a variety of chemicals that appear to be coming from the sky. It was especially interesting to hear Wigington talk about Dr.David Case suggesting that we put 20 million tons of aluminum nanoparticles in the atmosphere. Aluminum is toxic to humans.
Some states are concerned about the long term health and weather issues and have decided to take action. In early 2024, Tennessee passed a bill that bans the intentional injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals into the air. While this law doesn't explicitly mention stratospheric aerosol injection, it does prohibit spraying chemicals into the air to affect temperature, weather, or the intensity of the sunlight.
With so many people in South Dakota on medications and so many issues with water quality, one has to wonder if some of the challenges could be related to stratospheric aerosol injection (high-atmosphere, chemical spraying). And if this spraying is real, what might happen to health, water quality, and farm productivity if Tennessee-like legislation is passed in the state.
There is a lot of stress associated with legislation on this issue. If we pass legislation prohibiting the high-atmosphere, chemical spraying and it doesn’t exist, no harm has been done. If there is a problem with the spraying, the legislation would save the people of South Dakota from a lot of health misery and could significantly improve the water quality and farm productivity in the state.
South Dakota Voices Response: Will, thank you for sharing this information. It is extremely helpful.
Chat comment from WB: "One year ago last September, after several days of chemtrails over the Black Hills, I drove home from Rapid City to my place south of Pringle. I waited in Hill City for a hail storm to pass. Between Pringle and my turn off near Argyle there was so much hail the snow plows were out. I pulled over and put hail in a water bottle. I took the hail when I got home and put it in a mason jar. I had the mason jar water tested in Rapid City. They detected aluminum, barium and chromium. What more is that the water had a "Total Dissolved Solids" measurement of 10 ppm. That is the same as double osmosis filtered water. This means the US Government is spraying "aerosolized" chemicals and polluting everything with these chemicals. I have the report from the company that did the testing, contact me for a copy. I did not vote to be poisoned. Global warming is a scam. All weather modification should be stopped immediately."
When I was a child, weather modification was big news, as related in this post. Weather modification was considered an important military weapon, and the American public was subjected to those tests just like we used to not drink milk when the radiation fell from the skies due to nuclear testing. Attempts to modify the weather were made without notifying or "scaring" the public, and not all tests on modification of the weather, storms in particular, went well. You can research it.
Now weather modification rarely makes headlines, which may mean that it's taking place so often that it's considered standard procedure. This is yet another area of science where we need transparency and public education concerning exactly who and what, if anything, our government, or even private NGOs or corporations are doing in regards to modifying the weather.
The consequences of such actions are difficult to fully identify or quantify. The natural environment of our region, nation and planet is the result of an incredibly complex system of systems interlocked with many other biological and geological systems, not exclusively earthbound. Life and weather on the surface of the earth are affected by magma and magnetic cycles deep inside the earth as well as the moon's gravity and cycles of the sun's radiation. I rather doubt that anyone has a firm grasp of the potential consequences that could come from meddling in any of Nature's innumerable interconnecting elements.