Discussion about this post

User's avatar
South Dakota Voice's avatar

South Dakota Voices Response: Kevin, thank you for the note. Those are good questions. It was a lot easier for people who were born in the 1960s than for people who were born in 1990 or 2000, because the the people who were born in the 1960s had a chance to build income and make a large purchase before inflation spiraled out of control. Even without cigarettes and tattoos it is likely many people in the younger generations will not be able to afford a house. Of course having a house is not mandatory, but many people believe the government spending needs to be brought in line with income so the standard of living does not continue to drop.

Email comment from KP: "My question to you is are any of these living outside their means? I am 62 now. Raised 4 kids. I never once filed bankruptcy in all my life. Is it tough? Yes. I see a lot of younger families buying houses that are more than they need. Also see a lot of these spending money on alcohol, cigarettes, and tattoos. Are these necessary?"

Expand full comment
South Dakota Voice's avatar

South Dakota Voices Response: Peg, thanks for joining us. Printing money is definitely an issue.

Email Comment from PT: "If the government prints more money, inflation will hit us by the end of the summer. The so-called clean CR (Continuing Resolution) was Pelosi's CR. It had none of Musk's savings in it!!!! I pray that when it hits the Senate, they have enough sense to codify it line-by-line, coordinate it with Musk so that the savings, albeit them short, that Musk has discovered. Unfortunately, many of the senators are facing election issues and won't do what I suggest. It would be a blessing if the CR was set back to pre-Covid days, at least we Americans would have a chance."

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts