Lutheran Social Services has been in the news a lot recently, at the national level and now at the local level. Yes, Lutheran Social Services is providing refugee resettlement services, but one has to wonder if it is possible that their involvement in the foreign labor charade is just the tip of the iceberg.
Could the real problem be corporate welfare?
If a company wants to depress wages to gain or maintain market share, foreign workers are an excellent way to accomplish that goal, especially if they actively target war torn and politically unstable places where people are willing do almost anything to get to the United States.
Many things are not fully disclosed to these foreigners. Sadly, the wages they will be earning are not enough to support them and their family. And some people who are on foreign work visas are trafficked.
What is not disclosed to the taxpayer:
the supposed labor shortage has nothing do with a real shortage of workers, but a willingness of the employer to pay high enough wages to attract people to the jobs
the children of foreign workers add an additional burden to the school system, because the children are often not at grade level and do not speak the language
workers and their families have to live in taxpayer subsidized housing, because they are not earning enough to cover the cost of housing
workers and their families have to be given taxpayer funded food subsidies because they are not earning enough to cover food
workers are not making enough to cover transportation, so the taxpayers have to pay for public transportation
workers and their families add a strain to the medical system, because they do not have the money to pay for medical coverage so the taxpayer has to pick up the cost through taxpayer funded indigent care (health and social services are over 30% of the state budget)
So how do companies convince us to play the game? They offer jobs below the going wage and complain (loudly) when they can’t find workers. Then they get together for business meetings and social events and complain to each other about their plight. News travels — “there isn’t enough labor”.
Then the companies start reaching out to Thune, Rounds, and Johnson, begging for foreign work visas. Our Congressional delegation delivers not only workers, but a huge burden for the taxpayers.
On top of that, during the last 4 years President Biden opened the Southern border. In that case, companies didn’t even have to ask. They got labor and the taxpayer just got the burden.
Some of the burden is handled with state taxes, others with Federal taxes, but that isn’t enough. Organizations like the United Way reach out for donations which are used to help with immigrant programs at public schools, churches, and other places.
One has to wonder when the taxpayers will say enough is enough and force companies to start paying the full cost of each foreign worker.
I am sure that the good people at Lutheran Social Services and other religious/secular agencies who provide services to the immigrant community would be shocked to learn that they are participating in the 21st century version of the slave trade.
Read "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair. Sinclair documented this very situation as it was in the early 20th Century meat packing industry. It may not be quite as bad today as it was then, but the principle remains the same - get cheap labor any way you can, and let someone else deal with the consequences.
Corporations are an excellent mechanism for creating wealth, but they must be regulated in order to keep them from destroying themselves and everything around them in the process.
Bill, thank you for bringing up the article content, the way the articles are written, and the importance of peer review. Sadly, there are all kinds of problems with the peer review process right now (Stanford https://www.npr.org/2023/07/19/1188828810/stanford-university-president-resigns Harvard https://www.theguardian.com/education/2024/jan/06/harvard-claudine-gay-plagiarism), so we are using other techniques to vet topics. You are correct, the articles are written with a slant. This is intentional to encourage discussion.