Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Big Ed's avatar

Perhaps we need to spend the money we have on teachers and curriculae instead of giving 6 figures and SUV's to administrators.

Expand full comment
Michelle R's avatar

The total # of students in SD does not take into account the 10,536 Alternative Instruction students for 2023 (I double-checked). I would just like to point out that those parents are saving the state $116,106,720. (not exactly, because some of those per student costs are for things like administration & buildings, and of course the cost doesn't go up if you add a few more kids to each class/school - unless of course, then you have to build or hire more teachers).

However, it is important to remember that subset of students, because it reminds us that

1) we as citizens could be paying even more for education

(and maybe we are paying too much if the state is collecting enough money to cover those kids, and then it doesn't have too...hmmm)

2) it really does NOT take that much money to educate a student per year!

These parents (of which I am one) are often single-income families, and unless they are utilizing online classes (with live teachers) they are likely not even paying $2K per kid. (online classes are appx $600-700/yr for one subject). Quality curriculum just doesn't cost that much. (and guess what, every kid does NOT need a Chromebook in order to learn!)

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts